勞務合同和勞動合同的區別

1、二者的法律性質不同

勞(lao)動(dong)合(he)同是確立(li)勞(lao)動(dong)關系的(de)依(yi)據(ju)，屬(shu)于的(de)勞(lao)動(dong)法的(de)范疇；勞(lao)務(wu)合(he)同是建立(li)民(min)事、經(jing)(jing)濟法律(lv)關系的(de)依(yi)據(ju)，屬(shu)于民(min)法、經(jing)(jing)濟法的(de)范疇。

2、對合同主體要求不同

勞動合(he)同(tong)的(de)主(zhu)體(ti)一方(fang)是(shi)勞動者(zhe)，另一方(fang)是(shi)用人單(dan)位；勞務合(he)同(tong)的(de)主(zhu)體(ti)既(ji)可(ke)(ke)以都是(shi)公民(min)，也可(ke)(ke)以都是(shi)法人，或者(zhe)是(shi)公民(min)與法人，勞務合(he)同(tong)對(dui)主(zhu)體(ti)沒(mei)有特殊要求(qiu)。

3、合(he)同(tong)(tong)主體的(de)地(di)位(wei)不同(tong)(tong)

勞(lao)動合(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)簽(qian)訂后，勞(lao)動者便成為(wei)用(yong)人單位的一(yi)員，二者的關系具有(you)從(cong)屬性，勞(lao)務(wu)合(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)的主體之(zhi)間并不存在從(cong)屬關系，雙(shuang)方始終是相(xiang)互獨立的平等主體，以自己的名(ming)義分別履行合(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)規定的義務(wu)。

4、合同的內容不同

勞(lao)動合(he)同(tong)(tong)的一方(fang)(fang)當事(shi)人(ren)用人(ren)單(dan)位(wei)要為勞(lao)動者提供符合(he)國家規(gui)定的勞(lao)動條件和勞(lao)動保(bao)護用品；勞(lao)務合(he)同(tong)(tong)無(wu)須(xu)規(gui)定這方(fang)(fang)面(mian)的內容。

5、確定(ding)報酬的原則不同

在勞(lao)動(dong)合(he)同中，用人單位按(an)照勞(lao)動(dong)的(de)數量和質(zhi)量以及國(guo)家的(de)有關規(gui)定給付勞(lao)動(dong)報酬，勞(lao)動(dong)福利待遇等，體(ti)現按(an)勞(lao)分配的(de)原則；勞(lao)務(wu)合(he)同中的(de)勞(lao)務(wu)價(jia)格(ge)是按(an)等價(jia)有償的(de)原則支付。

勞動合同和勞務合同哪個更好

勞(lao)動合(he)同(tong)通常被(bei)認為更適合(he)員工(gong)，因為它提供了更多的(de)法律保護和工(gong)作穩定性。以(yi)下是勞(lao)動合(he)同(tong)相對(dui)于勞(lao)務合(he)同(tong)的(de)幾個優勢：

1、法(fa)律保護(hu)：勞(lao)動(dong)(dong)合同受到《勞(lao)動(dong)(dong)合同法(fa)》的保護(hu)，這(zhe)意味著它(ta)擁有更加全(quan)面和(he)詳盡的法(fa)律保障，當發生糾紛時(shi)，勞(lao)動(dong)(dong)者可以向當地的勞(lao)動(dong)(dong)仲裁(cai)委員(yuan)會申請勞(lao)動(dong)(dong)仲裁(cai)。

2、收(shou)入(ru)(ru)和福利：勞(lao)動(dong)合同(tong)下的收(shou)入(ru)(ru)通常是穩定的，并且公(gong)司(si)會為其(qi)繳納社會保險(xian)(xian)，員工(gong)(gong)還可以享受到法定節(jie)假日的福利待(dai)遇。在工(gong)(gong)作期(qi)間發生(sheng)的風險(xian)(xian)由公(gong)司(si)承擔，但(dan)員工(gong)(gong)需要遵守(shou)公(gong)司(si)制度(du)，并且在合同(tong)解(jie)除時可以獲得相應的賠(pei)償。

3、工作和風險的承擔：在勞動合同下，工作的風險主要由公司承擔，員(yuan)工只需(xu)要按(an)時完成(cheng)工作(zuo)任務并獲(huo)得約定的(de)勞務報酬即可(ke)。相比(bi)之下(xia)，勞務合同(tong)下(xia)的(de)工作(zuo)者則(ze)需(xu)要自行承擔工作(zuo)風險，且在(zai)合同(tong)解(jie)除時可(ke)能無法獲(huo)得額外的(de)賠償。

勞務合同和勞動合同可以一起簽嗎

勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務合(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)和(he)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動(dong)合(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)不能一起簽。根據(ju)現行的《中華(hua)人民共和(he)國勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動(dong)合(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)法》的規(gui)定，勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動(dong)者(zhe)只(zhi)能與(yu)(yu)用(yong)人單位(wei)簽訂(ding)(ding)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動(dong)合(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)，或(huo)者(zhe)與(yu)(yu)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務派(pai)(pai)(pai)遣公(gong)司(si)簽訂(ding)(ding)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務派(pai)(pai)(pai)遣合(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)，而不能同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)時(shi)簽訂(ding)(ding)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務合(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)和(he)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動(dong)合(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)。如果勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動(dong)者(zhe)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)時(shi)在(zai)不同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)的情況下(xia)與(yu)(yu)兩個(ge)或(huo)以上的主體建(jian)立了勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動(dong)關系，比(bi)如與(yu)(yu)一個(ge)用(yong)人單位(wei)和(he)一個(ge)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務派(pai)(pai)(pai)遣公(gong)司(si)都(dou)簽訂(ding)(ding)了合(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)，那么其中一個(ge)用(yong)人單位(wei)或(huo)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務派(pai)(pai)(pai)遣公(gong)司(si)都(dou)有(you)權解除勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動(dong)合(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)。