連帶清償責任是什么
連(lian)帶(dai)清償責(ze)任(ren)是指數人(ren)(ren)債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)者承擔共同(tong)清償債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)的法律(lv)責(ze)任(ren),也(ye)就(jiu)說數人(ren)(ren)負(fu)同(tong)一(yi)債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu),明示對于(yu)債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)權(quan)人(ren)(ren)各負(fu)全部給(gei)付(fu)之(zhi)責(ze)任(ren)。債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)權(quan)人(ren)(ren)有權(quan)要(yao)求任(ren)何一(yi)個債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)人(ren)(ren)還錢。連(lian)帶(dai)債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)之(zhi)債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)權(quan)人(ren)(ren),得對于(yu)債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)人(ren)(ren)中(zhong)之(zhi)一(yi)人(ren)(ren)或數人(ren)(ren)或其(qi)全體(ti),同(tong)時或先後請(qing)求全部或一(yi)部之(zhi)給(gei)付(fu)。連(lian)帶(dai)債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)未全部履行前,全體(ti)債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)人(ren)(ren)仍負(fu)連(lian)帶(dai)責(ze)任(ren)。
根據《擔(dan)保(bao)(bao)(bao)法(fa)》的(de)有(you)關(guan)規(gui)(gui)定(ding),保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)是指保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)人(ren)(ren)和債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)權人(ren)(ren)約(yue)定(ding),當債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)(wu)人(ren)(ren)不履行(xing)(xing)債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)(wu)時,保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)人(ren)(ren)按照約(yue)定(ding)履行(xing)(xing)債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)(wu)或者承(cheng)擔(dan)責(ze)任(ren)(ren)的(de)行(xing)(xing)為。保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)的(de)方式有(you)一(yi)般保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)和連(lian)(lian)帶(dai)責(ze)任(ren)(ren)保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)。當事人(ren)(ren)在(zai)保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)合同(tong)中(zhong)約(yue)定(ding)保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)人(ren)(ren)與債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)(wu)人(ren)(ren)對(dui)債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)(wu)承(cheng)擔(dan)連(lian)(lian)帶(dai)責(ze)任(ren)(ren)的(de),為連(lian)(lian)帶(dai)責(ze)任(ren)(ren)保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)。連(lian)(lian)帶(dai)責(ze)任(ren)(ren)保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)的(de)債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)(wu)人(ren)(ren)在(zai)主(zhu)合同(tong)規(gui)(gui)定(ding)的(de)債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)(wu)履行(xing)(xing)期屆(jie)滿沒有(you)履行(xing)(xing)債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)(wu)的(de),債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)權人(ren)(ren)可以要求債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)(wu)人(ren)(ren)履行(xing)(xing)債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)(wu),也可以要求保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)人(ren)(ren)在(zai)其保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)范(fan)圍內承(cheng)擔(dan)保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)責(ze)任(ren)(ren)。保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)人(ren)(ren)承(cheng)擔(dan)保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)責(ze)任(ren)(ren)后,有(you)權向債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)(wu)人(ren)(ren)追償。此外,《民法(fa)通則(ze)》第89條、《經濟合同(tong)法(fa)》第15條以及有(you)關(guan)司(si)法(fa)解釋(shi)對(dui)因保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)而承(cheng)擔(dan)連(lian)(lian)帶(dai)責(ze)任(ren)(ren)也作了明確規(gui)(gui)定(ding)。
連帶責任擔保債權清償順序
《最高人(ren)(ren)民法(fa)(fa)(fa)院關于適用<中華人(ren)(ren)民共(gong)和國擔(dan)保(bao)(bao)法(fa)(fa)(fa)>若干問(wen)題的解釋(shi)》第(di)二(er)十(shi)條規定(ding)(ding),“連(lian)(lian)(lian)帶(dai)(dai)共(gong)同保(bao)(bao)證的保(bao)(bao)證人(ren)(ren)承(cheng)擔(dan)保(bao)(bao)證責(ze)任后(hou),向債(zhai)務人(ren)(ren)不能(neng)追償(chang)(chang)的部(bu)分(fen),由各連(lian)(lian)(lian)帶(dai)(dai)保(bao)(bao)證人(ren)(ren)按其(qi)內(nei)部(bu)約定(ding)(ding)的比例分(fen)擔(dan)。沒有約定(ding)(ding)的,平(ping)均(jun)分(fen)擔(dan)”。由此(ci)可(ke)見(jian),在連(lian)(lian)(lian)帶(dai)(dai)共(gong)同保(bao)(bao)證中,其(qi)中一個連(lian)(lian)(lian)帶(dai)(dai)保(bao)(bao)證人(ren)(ren)先行向債(zhai)權人(ren)(ren)清償(chang)(chang)債(zhai)務的,其(qi)享有向其(qi)他(ta)責(ze)任人(ren)(ren)追償(chang)(chang)的權利,但應(ying)首先向主(zhu)債(zhai)務人(ren)(ren)追償(chang)(chang),如(ru)主(zhu)債(zhai)務人(ren)(ren)清償(chang)(chang)不能(neng)的,再(zai)由其(qi)他(ta)連(lian)(lian)(lian)帶(dai)(dai)保(bao)(bao)證人(ren)(ren)在前者不能(neng)清償(chang)(chang)的范圍內(nei)償(chang)(chang)付。《最高人(ren)(ren)民法(fa)(fa)(fa)院關于適用中華人(ren)(ren)民共(gong)和國擔(dan)保(bao)(bao)法(fa)(fa)(fa)若干問(wen)題的解釋(shi)理解與適用》作為法(fa)(fa)(fa)官審判業務的重要參考文獻,也闡明了這一先后(hou)順序。
但是追(zhui)償(chang)(chang)順(shun)序有先后并不代表訴(su)訟需要分開(kai)進行(xing)。在實際糾紛中,已經(jing)清償(chang)(chang)債(zhai)務(wu)的連(lian)帶保(bao)證人(ren)可(ke)以同時(shi)起(qi)訴(su)主債(zhai)務(wu)人(ren)和(he)(he)其他連(lian)帶保(bao)證人(ren),要求兩者分別承擔全部清償(chang)(chang)責任和(he)(he)補充(chong)清償(chang)(chang)責任,在執行(xing)程序中先以主債(zhai)務(wu)人(ren)的財產受償(chang)(chang);也可(ke)以先起(qi)訴(su)債(zhai)務(wu)人(ren),在對其財產執行(xing)完畢(bi)后再起(qi)訴(su)連(lian)帶保(bao)證責任人(ren)。
但是,后一種做法不可避免的會涉及到訴訟時效的問題,即對主債務人起訴是否會對其他連帶保證人發生訴訟時效中斷的效果。《最高人民法院關于民事案件訴訟時效若干問題的解釋》第十七條只規定了連帶之債中訴訟時效中斷事由的涉他性,而連帶保證人先行清償后,主債務人和其他連帶保證人之間并非連帶責任關系,而是補充責任關系,因此其中一方訴訟時效中斷的事由是否具有涉他性沒有明確的法律依據。
夫妻共同債務離婚時是否具有連帶清償責任
1、連帶責任(ren)是(shi)指兩(liang)(liang)個或兩(liang)(liang)個以上的(de)債(zhai)務(wu)人(ren)分別就共同債(zhai)務(wu)對債(zhai)權人(ren)承擔(dan)全部清償的(de)責任(ren)。連帶責任(ren)制(zhi)(zhi)度(du)是(shi)與債(zhai)務(wu)人(ren)有(you)連帶關系(xi)的(de)人(ren)承擔(dan)債(zhai)務(wu)責任(ren)的(de)制(zhi)(zhi)度(du)。
2、婚姻(yin)法第四十(shi)一條規(gui)(gui)定(ding),離婚時,原為夫妻(qi)共(gong)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)生活(huo)所負(fu)的(de)債務(wu)(wu)(wu),應當共(gong)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)償還(huan)(huan)(huan)。既然規(gui)(gui)定(ding)夫妻(qi)共(gong)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)生活(huo)所負(fu)的(de)債務(wu)(wu)(wu),應當由(you)夫妻(qi)兩方(fang)共(gong)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)償還(huan)(huan)(huan),也就(jiu)包含了夫妻(qi)兩方(fang)中(zhong)的(de)任(ren)(ren)何一方(fang)都負(fu)有清償全部債務(wu)(wu)(wu)(共(gong)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)債務(wu)(wu)(wu))的(de)義務(wu)(wu)(wu),在此不能(neng)將共(gong)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)償還(huan)(huan)(huan)僅(jin)僅(jin)理解(jie)為夫妻(qi)兩方(fang)等份償還(huan)(huan)(huan)。共(gong)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)償還(huan)(huan)(huan)就(jiu)設定(ding)了償還(huan)(huan)(huan)共(gong)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)債務(wu)(wu)(wu)是夫妻(qi)兩方(fang)的(de)共(gong)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)責(ze)任(ren)(ren)。
3、婚姻法第四十一條同時還規定,共同財產不足清償的,或財產歸各自所有的,由雙方協議清償;協議不成時,由人民法院判決。這就規定了,夫妻共同(tong)財產(chan)不(bu)足(zu)以償還共同(tong)債務(wu)時,夫妻兩(liang)方則要以各(ge)自的個人財產(chan)清(qing)償共同(tong)債務(wu),而并不(bu)是規定對共同(tong)財產(chan)不(bu)足(zu)的部分予(yu)以免(mian)責(ze)。這就說明(ming)夫妻兩(liang)方對共同(tong)債務(wu)的清(qing)償是一(yi)種無(wu)限連帶責(ze)任。